Saveliev Alexander Anatolievich. In the fishing industry - emergency
- Date of: 27.12.2012
GRNIP: 312774636200749
Tax authority:
Reason for the change:(R21001) Registration of a sole trader as an individual entrepreneur
Documentation:
- P21001 Application for registration of a sole trader as an individual entrepreneur
- An identity document of a citizen of the Russian Federation
- Application for the transition to a simplified taxation system - Date of: 27.12.2012
GRNIP: 412774636209902
Tax authority: Interdistrict Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service No. 46 for Moscow, No. 7746
Reason for the change: - Date of: 29.12.2012
GRNIP: 412774636408063
Tax authority: Interdistrict Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service No. 46 for Moscow, No. 7746
Reason for the change: - Date of: 20.02.2013
GRNIP: 413774605100676
Tax authority: Interdistrict Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service No. 46 for Moscow, No. 7746
Reason for the change:(R26001) Termination of IP activities
Documentation:
- R26001 Application for termination of IP activities
- A document confirming the submission of information to the FIU
- Document confirming the payment of the state fee - Date of: 20.02.2013
GRNIP: 413774605100687
Tax authority: Interdistrict Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service No. 46 for Moscow, No. 7746
Reason for the change: Entering information about accounting with the tax authority - Date of: 11.12.2013
GRNIP: 413774634507553
Tax authority: Interdistrict Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service No. 46 for Moscow, No. 7746
Reason for the change: Entering information about registration in the Pension Fund of the Russian Federation
Alexander Saveliev Head of the Fisheries Information Agency
Fishing from January 1 next year, which is 90 days away, will be suspended.
The other day, during an all-Russian conference call, the Department of Science and Education of the Federal Agency for Fisheries informed the public that the deadlines for the state environmental review of total allowable catches and their adjustments were not met. This means that an emergency situation has arisen.
The total allowable catch, or TAC, is a fundamental indicator for the industry. Every fisherman, every fishing company in Russia that owns quotas for fishing fish or other aquatic biological resources, is waiting for this indicator to see what share of this TAC is allowed to be caught next year in order to build their plans in order to eventually start the actual fishery from 1 January. This is a fundamental thing for the industry. Without the ODE, no fishing will begin.
This year the fishermen were left without ODU!
Due to the large, or rather unprecedented, number of comments from the Federal Service for Supervision of Natural Resources to the materials prepared by the Federal Agency for Fishery, orders to conduct a state environmental review were issued by the relevant Department of the Federal Service for Supervision of Natural Resources with an unacceptable delay. For example, in the Far East federal district- 17, 18, 19 September. At the same time, the period for conducting an examination for the TAC for the next year, 2019, is two months, and another month for adjusting the TAC. That is, we are not in time for the New Year.
In dry bureaucratic language, it looks like this. The State Environmental Expert Review of the TAC for 2019 cannot be completed within the time frame established by the government decree Russian Federation dated July 25, 2009 No. 531 "On the determination and approval of the total allowable catch of aquatic biological resources and its change" - until October 1 of the current year. This will lead to the lack of opportunities for the Federal Agency for Fishery to timely distribute quotas for the production (catch) of aquatic biological resources and issue permits within the regulatory deadlines and, accordingly, to stop fishing in relation to most types of aquatic biological resources from January 1, 2019.
Needless to say, the failure to meet the deadlines for the examination entails significant losses for the enterprises of the fishery complex, primarily in the pollock fishery and a whole range of fish in coastal fisheries? Moreover, these losses cannot be compensated even during subsequent work due to the limited period of fishing in winter period. Needless to say, such a New Year's gift from the Federal Agency for Fishery will not add gastronomic joy and variety to the already meager fish counters to the holiday?
The only thing that somehow justifies the officials is their extreme workload. Over the past year, the Federal Agency for Fishery has been so carried away by organizing auctions in the industry that, as they say, hands do not reach the implementation of direct functionality.
Now the forecast.
The state environmental review and adjustment of the TAC for a number of commercial facilities will be completed no earlier than October 16th. The issue of orders of the Ministry of Agriculture of Russia and the Federal Agency for Fishery on the distribution of quotas for the extraction (catch) of aquatic biological resources between users will take place within three to four weeks. And they still need to be published!
Of course, in the conditions of the emergency that has arisen, officials will now stir, but a downtime in the field is guaranteed.
Who will bear the responsibility for millions of losses, for lost tax revenues, for unpaid salaries? Who is responsible for this mess?
Now, as usual, appeals from all coastal regions will fly to the government, to the president, indignation, indignation, demands ... (Let's note in brackets that, for example, Oleg Kozhemyako needs this on the eve of the elections ?!) In fact, many questions arise. But the question of when and which officials will fly out of their comfortable seats is just as important for the industry as the formation of ODUs in accordance with government regulations.
In fact, such appeals, indignations, indignations and demands for Last year a lot has accumulated. I'll just name a recent one. The All-Russian Association of Fishermen appealed to the Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation with a request to evaluate the effectiveness government controlled in the fishery sector. VARPE President German Zverev sent an appeal to Alexei Kudrin, Chairman of the RF SP, asking him to openly analyze the methods for assessing the effectiveness of state management in the fisheries sector, which are used by federal departments, and the financial and economic risks of legislative instability. "In the last 3-4 months, the actions of the government of the Russian Federation regarding the regulation of the fishery complex bear all the signs of" regulatory chaos ", the press service of the VARPE quotes German Zverev's letter on its website.
It will be interesting to know the reaction of the head of the department Alexei Kudrin, who introduced this term in the Development Strategy of the Russian Federation for 2018-2024, being the head of the Center for Strategic Research, as well as the reaction of other responsible persons to the current emergency situation in fishing industry.
Fish processing enterprises that are members of the Fish Union proposed to lift the ban on the supply of fish from some countries of the world, introduced in August 2014. The initiative is due to the fact that it did not happen. About why the Russian fish export market is “more popular” than the domestic one and what is the price of seafood production for domestic use, argues head of the information agency for fishery Alexander Savelyev:
I understand the Fisheries Union because they made super profits from the rubbish they brought from abroad, including this Norwegian aquacultured salmon and trout. According to Norwegian scientists, this is the most toxic food in the world. Now the concern of the Fish Union is due to the fact that most of the Russian fish, about 60%, caught in Russia, is sent directly for export. Moreover, the government and the Federal Agency for Fishery proposes to spend another trillion rubles on export promotion.
A completely absurd situation arises: on the one hand, we motivate and stimulate exports in every possible way, we export our own fish, and on the other hand, we are perplexed that fish processing enterprises do not have enough raw materials. Here, as they say, “either put on shorts or take off the cross,” so you need to turn on all the levers in the hands of the regulator in order to saturate the domestic market with your own fish. Including it is necessary to provide raw materials. by the most effective way for this is the differentiation of fees for the use of aquatic biological resources.
This means that if the fish is exported, then it is necessary to fulfill the plan by 100%, and if for the domestic market, to the enterprises of your country, then, accordingly, 0%. It is necessary to cancel VAT refunds to exporters, to remove all extortions in their native ports, which build some insurmountable administrative barriers in the way of fishermen, there are a lot of levers. It is necessary to create all conditions for saturating the domestic market, to motivate it. So far, the whole economic situation is developing in such a way that it is simply more profitable to export fish. Firstly, the dollar exchange rate has increased, and secondly, when we joined the WTO, we undertook obligations to nullify import and export duties.
The mechanism is clear: every customs officer, border guard and "skin". Only veterinary documents cost Russian fishermen about 9 billion rubles a year. In such a situation, who in their right mind would take the fish to their home port? Therefore, these bewilderments and these groans about the lack of raw materials are quite understandable, on the one hand, and on the other hand, everything is in the hands of the regulator - you need to turn on your head, first of all. Fish business due to "regulatory chaos" incurs losses of 17 billion rubles annually.
Alexander Saveliev Head of the Fisheries Information Agency
Literally on the eve of the IV All-Russian Congress of Fishermen of Fisheries, a grandiose scandal erupted. It suddenly turned out that 600 thousand tons of aquatic biological resources, which will be withdrawn from all Russian fishing companies for investment in the construction of ships and processing factories, are actually destined for the Russian Fishery Company. Mostly. Four years ago, the industry assumed that the “weaning” of part of the quotas for investment projects was started in the interests of only this “limited liability company”, and now, when they looked into the protocol of the commission for selecting applications for investment quotas, even some doubts were dispelled.
It turned out that some companies will be able to conclude agreements on securing investment quotas for the construction of ships and factories without auction procedures, while others will gain access to these quotas through auctions. Worse, in the Far East, with the most demanded fish resources, the following companies are in the forefront: Mintai Pervy LLC, Novy Seyval LLC, Troitsa Bay LLC, Novostroy LLC, Novy Voskhod LLC, RRPK Vostok LLC ". All these legal entities were registered only last year, they are located in Vladivostok on Pushkinskaya Street and were born not without the participation of the Russian Fishery Company.
A couple of years ago, at a meeting of the Presidium of the State Council on the development of the fishery complex, Vladimir Putin uttered a sacramental phrase: “Indeed, there are people who are very good. Now we need to distribute this “very good” to the entire population of the country.”
It seems that not everyone heard it, and they strive to make it even better.
What do we have now? A radical change in the law on fisheries for investment purposes and the issuance of about 30 government decrees aimed at updating the fishing fleet and coastal processing enterprises. New legal documents are baked like pies. Attentive experts only manage to detect flagrant inconsistencies in them.
Another scandal that spoiled the solemn pre-Congress mood is precisely related to the published rules for the distribution of production quotas in sea waters. We are talking about nothing less than the grounds for refusing to fix the share of the quota.
The experts found that the wording of one of the grounds for refusing to secure a share of the quota jeopardizes the acquisition of the right to production for any company that has a contract concluded by universal succession or auction within the last 9 years. And, of course, they suspected that such a wording appeared for a reason, but in the interests of "people who are very well."
Rosrybolovstvo immediately, in response to the appeal of the VARPE, promised to correct the “mistake” by April 1, however, the fishermen still had a sediment, and now they simply tripled their vigilance.
The fishermen are talking according to Zhvanetsky: “Everything is going well. Only by," - therefore, in the draft appeal to the President of Russia, the government, the State Duma and the Federal Assembly, on the eve of the congress, along with an extremely fundamental question for the industry about the inviolability of the "historical principle", they introduced, I quote verbatim: "To draw the attention of the Ministry of Agriculture of Russia to the inadmissibility of poor-quality preparation of regulatory legal acts entailing negative consequences for the fishery complex, including material losses ... "And also:" To ask the Federal Agency for Fishery to provide public control to post on the website of the Federal Agency for Fishery for a period of at least 10 working days a draft decision of the interdepartmental Commission to determine the shares assigned to Russian applicants who filed applications for their receipt, in the total volume of quotas for the catch (production) of aquatic biological resources.
The concern of the fishermen is understandable. The pre-Congress sentiments were not limited to two scandals. True, the mine that the developers laid in the draft federal law “On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation in the Field of Fisheries and the Conservation of Aquatic Biological Resources in Part of Conducting Auctions in Electronic Form” is just about to explode. Having been burned on the milk of investment quotas, the industry is now blowing on the water of each document and is concerned, but are these muddy amendments being prepared in the interests of the same “people who are doing very well”? After all, with the help of the underlying mechanism, you can masterfully juggle not only with the conduct, but most importantly, with the results of these very “electronic auctions”. This is first. And secondly, it became quite obvious in whose interests these same auctions are being prepared in general. Especially crab!
The attention of the fishermen did not pass by the speech at the Sochi Economic Forum of the Minister of the Russian Federation for the Open Government, Mikhail Abyzov, “Is it easy to be an entrepreneur. The view of business and government.
“Not long ago,” the minister said, “together with the Federal Security Service, we conducted a survey of entrepreneurs. 11,000 people were interviewed about the problems of relations with control and supervisory authorities.” 65% of respondents said that the main problems are related to the frequently changing rules of the game. A third of entrepreneurs named excessive reporting and bureaucracy as one of the key difficulties. Another third noted the problems associated with the manifestation of corruption.
The congress of fishermen will demonstrate, perhaps, other alignments. Let's see.
These are the times, as Vladimir Vladimirovich Pozner says.
